But I also believe you can do simply 'make fs' as suggested.
--
Regards,
Rune V. Sjøen
You always pass failure on the way to success
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Mulyadi SantosaI think you can just do "make fs"
<mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi...
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:10 AM, bajrangi pandey
> <bajrangi12pandey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> suppose i am making changes in kernel file fs.h
>>
>> Is it necessary to perform all three steps
>> 1> make
--
>> 2> make modules_install
>> 3> make install
>> to rebuilt the kernel (compiling same kernel version source code 2nd time)?
>> can i skip step
>> make modules_install
>
> My best guess is yes, you need to do all the above step. The reason is
> to make sure all the related code pick your modification.
>
> You don't need to worry if compilation time is your concern. "make"
> will make sure only .c files that depends on this fs.h that get
> recompiled. So theoritically, it should be done relatively faster.
>
> --
> regards,
>
> Mulyadi Santosa
> Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
>
> blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
> training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
> "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
>
>
Thanks -
Manish
==================================
[$\*.^ -- I miss being one of them
==================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
