thanks again. ;-) On Wednesday 09 September 2009 18:15:11 you wrote: > Hi Mosta... > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM, mosta<mosta.me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hey everyone, > > > > is there a difference between kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA) and > > bigphysarea_alloc (size). I god a driver that use the bigphysarea patch > > and I changed it to use kmalloc (because for my kernel version there is > > no patch) and it worked. So my question is, is the bigphysarea patch > > arcade and kmalloc can allocate enough continuous memory or did I just > > added on error to the driver ;-). > > > > Oh I use the 3.6.24.3 Kernel > > > > greetings mosta > > Once I read this bigphysarea patch a bit ( not sure, probably when > answering related question from you days weeks ago) and I came to the > conclusion that essentially it's the same like doing kmalloc with DMA. > > I guess the reason why bigphysarea patch created was likely at old > version of Linux kernels, there was no option to reserve such memory > area like we have now with bootmemalloc IIRC. > > Also, kmalloc might fail to allocate the amout of memory (especially > if it is big enough) you need due to fragmentation, something that > unlikely happen during boot stage because RAM is still in "fresh" > condition. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
