Re: /proc/kallsyms related question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Usman S. Ansari<uansari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am looking at SL Linux 5.2 (kernel version 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5) and Fedora Core 8 (kernel version 2.6.23.1-42.fc8).
>
> If I grep for inet_family_ops in (in /proc/kallsyms) 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5, nothing shows, while same grep returns a match in 2.6.23.1-42.fc8.
>
> While symbol itself (inet_family_ops) is not important. My question is why a symbol with same definition shows up in 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 and not in 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.
>
> Is there fundamental change in how symbols appear in /proc/kallsyms ?
>

Brief check using lxr.linux.no, I found no codes that might hide
inet_family_ops in your Scientific Linux kernel (I simply assume it's
based on 2.6.18 vanilla).

So, IMO, there might be one explanation left. Scientific Linux kernel
is compiled with CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=n. Reading the related Kconfig
help info, I think this is it. Try to check your Scientific Linux
kernel .config file.

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer
blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux