Re: Checking of NULL with __GFP_NOFAIL in kzalloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What happens in a situation where there is no allocatable memory? Allocator would return NULL, isn't it ?





From: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2009 2:09:13 PM
Subject: Checking of NULL with __GFP_NOFAIL in kzalloc()

Hi,

While going through jbd code, I was wondering why do we need to check
new_transaction for NULL, if we are passing __GFP_NOFAIL ?
Last code change around this code was when Ted converted kmalloc to
kzalloc, but since he also didn't remove it I am guessing there would
be some good reason for it. Can someone enlighten me ?

start_this_handle() {
..........
       ..........
       new_transaction = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_transaction),
                       GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
       if (!new_transaction) {
               ret = -ENOMEM;
               goto out;
       }
       ..........
}


Thanks -
Manish

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux