On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Andre Prendel <andre_prendel@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:22:44PM +0800, shark huang wrote:> 2.6.28<http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.28.bz2>2008-12-24
> Hi: From the homepage of http://kernelnewbies.org/ , you can get
> following information:
>
> The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is:
> 23:45 UTCF<http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.28.tar.bz2>
> V<http://www.kernel.org/diff/diffview.cgi?file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fv2.6%2Fpatch-2.6.28.bz2>
> VI<http://www.kernel.org/diff/diffview.cgi?file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fv2.6%2Ftesting%2Fincr%2Fpatch-2.6.28-rc9-final.bz2>
> C<http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=summary>
>Hi,
> My question is that since the latest stable version is 2.6.28,why the
> latest development tree and mm tree is 2.6.28-git12 and 2.6.28-rc2-mm1
> instead of 2.6.29-gitx and 2.6.29-rcx-mmx?
look at the following document
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/publications/linuxkerneldevelopment.php.
This is my doubt! Now the latest stable version is 2.26.28 but the latest rc version is 2.6. 28-rc9. It should be 2.26.29-rcx according to the document.
This explains the developement model.
Andre