On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> To the best I know, you can only lock anonymous page... >>> >> >> interesting....never knew that....do u know (or guess) why? > > It is based on my assumption that anonymous page doesn't have backing > storage, thus it's kinda make sense if we want to lock it in RAM. > > While for page cache, theoritically we aren't supposed to lock it. > However, to me, what Paulo already did bring new dimension of thinking > :) > > regards, > > Mulyadi > Good sharing...I learned a ton... :-). thanks. -- Regards, Peter Teoh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
