Re: [Bulk] Re: fork and exec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 12:46 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 11:26 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 15:39 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> >> > [....]
> >> >> I also think it is useful to realize that UNIX was basically designed
> >> >> for systems that have a MMU even though low-end systems in the late
> >> >> 70s / early 80s did not have them.
> >> >
> >> > The first ones (also before) didn't have a MMU and the first versions of
> >> > "Unix" ran on it.
> >> >
> >> >> I believe there were implementations that ran on 286 based hardware
> >> >> without MMUs way back then, but they were very kludgy and definately
> >> >> not the design target for UNIX.
> >> >
> >> > Of course they were as that was common hardware in the 60s and
> >> > (earlier?) 70s.
> >>
> >> I think you have your history a little off. (I may too.)
> >
> > Maybe.
> >
> >> Per Wikipedia:
> >>
> >> The Intel's 286[1], introduced on February 1, 1982, (originally named
> >> 80286, and also called iAPX 286 in the programmer's manual) was an x86
> >> 16-bit microprocessor with 134,000 transistors.
> >
> > And that didn't have a MMU. MMUs came to the PC world with the 80386
> 
> Agreed,  I think that is even what I said ;)
> 
> >> iirc, the DEC PDP computers were some of the first computers to have
> >> UNIX on them.
> >
> > Yup. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-7 in '65. I don't think it had an
> > MMU. Nothing to be found around the above page about that (at least by
> > me).
> 
> Per http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/ch02s01.html
> 
> >>
> Unix's first real job, in 1971, was to support what would now be
> called word processing for the Bell Labs patent department; the first
> Unix application was the ancestor of the nroff(1) text formatter. This
> project justified the purchase of a PDP-11, a much more capable
> minicomputer.
> >>
> 
> So the pdp-11 was one of the very early targets for UNIX.  That series

Yes, running version 7 according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-11,
years after the PDP-7.

> did have MMUs on at least some of them.  I admit I don't know exactly
> when UNIX started taking advantage of MMU hardware, but my first
> experience with UNIX was around 1981 using Perkin Elmer computers.
> The MMU was a well supported feature by then.

Yup.

> UNIX for Intel x86 class machines did not yet exist.

ACK
	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux