On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:28:01AM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > On Feb 20, 2008 11:10 AM, Raseel Bhagat <raseelbhagat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Tomy > > > > > > On Feb 20, 2008 3:29 PM, tomy <tomy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > tomy wrote: > > > There is no problem with the file system, I have checked > > > that.But is there any thing to specify in the boot loader regarding the > > > files system (Eg: Flash sector address or File system size ....) > > > > > > > > > > Firsty, please refrain from top-posting in a public mailing list. > > > > Now, my point is, your kernel options indicate that /dev/mtdblock3 contains > > your root filesystem. The first thing to check is that /dev/mtdblock3 > > really contains the root filesystem, i.e., have you flashed correctly ? > > Tomy should also make sure that the contents of his file system are > correct, as I mentioned in my post. > I think this error is more likely than that he mixed up the flash partitions. Another possibility is that the binary itself is there, but it's supporting libraries aren't (libc, etc.). That has bitten me a couple of times. Yet another tricky one is that the dynamic linker (/lib/ld.so) is not available or configured with the wrong library paths. Erik -- They're all fools. Don't worry. Darwin may be slow, but he'll eventually get them. -- Matthew Lammers in alt.sysadmin.recovery
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
