Re: Slub versus slab

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:54:47 +0100,
Andrea Gasparini <gaspa@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> there's someone with experience on Slub/slab performance?
> I would understand when to use the first, when the latter...
> 
> I found that on numa architecture is surely bettere SLUB.[1]
> But this is a rare case, imho. [or: in my experience]
> 
> In a "normal" i386 architecture, with some ram intensive applications
> (we did video processing), what kernel should I use? 

As far as I've understood the SLUB development, I'd say the SLUB
intends to be a drop-in replacement for SLAB, usable in all situations,
with performances at least equal to the ones of SLAB, but with a better
scalability.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxx, http://thomas.enix.org
Jabber, thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxx
Toulibre, http://www.toulibre.org - APRIL, http://www.april.org
Fingerprint : 0BE1 4CF3 CEA4 AC9D CC6E  1624 F653 CB30 98D3 F7A7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux