Re: Shared Interrupt handling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/3/07, Rajat Jain <rajat.noida.india@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Doesn't the following code in handle_IRQ_event() suggest that ALL the
interrupt handlers are called, IRRESPECTIVE of the return value?

        do {
                ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
                if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
                        status |= action->flags;
                retval |= ret;
                action = action->next;
        } while (action);

it certainly seems that way huh ;)

makes sense too for the reasons "k b" highlighted
-mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux