Re: significance of __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/26/07, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:38:53 +0530 Rajat Jain wrote:

> On 4/25/07, pradeep singh <2500.pradeep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What is significance of __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED macro?
> >
>
> Hi Pradeep,
>
> This architecture specific macro if defined, means that the IRQs are
> guaranteed to be disabled when irq_exit() function is called. In such
> a case, the kernel may skip some instructions (disabling IRQs etc)
> .... and thus call __do_IRQ() instead of do_IRQ.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rajat
>
> (PS: Though, I could not make out if there is any architecture that
> could have IRQs enabled at the time irq_exit() is called).


./include/asm-arm/hardirq.h:#define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED       1
./include/asm-blackfin/hardirq.h:#define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED  1

Thanks Randy

~psr


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***



--
play the game

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux