On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:39:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > i'm curious -- are there any filesystem implementations for linux > > that don't fit nicely into the VFS model? that don't follow the > > convenient file/dentry/inode/superblock standard? > > > > I didn't read about VFS yet, but I've heard that ReiserFS-4 wasn't > accepted mainline due to VFS abuses. I don't know if those abuses > were similar to the one you mentioned. i wasn't thinking so much of deliberate "abuses" so much as just design decisions that didn't fit nicely into the VFS framework. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
