Re: ERR_PTR and PTR_ERR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 20:21 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:23:07 -0400 Ming Zhang wrote:
> 
> > Hi All
> > 
> > I know sometime we need ERR_PTR and PTR_ERR, but why we need to write
> > code like this line 356 in quotactl_block()
> > 
> > 353         bdev = lookup_bdev(tmp);
> > 354         putname(tmp);
> > 355         if (IS_ERR(bdev))
> > 356                 return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(bdev))
> > 
> > instead of 
> > 
> > 	return bdev
> > 
> > it convert a PTR to ERR and then back to PTR. any idea why?
> 
> Did you test what happens when you change that return line to be only
> 			return bdev;
> ?  Please do so.

sorry i should be more accurate.

ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(bdev)) is like to 

return (void *)(long)bdev; 

then what is the difference between this and 

return (void *)bdev;


from speed, this 2 should have no difference. then any other
consideration?


> 
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux