Re: is __copy_to_user_inatomic is really atomic ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Aneesh...


Hi,

Is __copy_from_user_inatomic and __copy_to_user_inatomic really atomic
?.
Looking from the name and the code, I think the operation is clearly non atomic, especially if it copies larger than data bus (am I right?) size e.g 32 bit for 32 bit CPU.

What is the implication of zeroing the tail ?
I don't get it, which tail were you referring to?

How does it results
in sleep.
Well, since nothing prevent swapping out user pages in between user-kernel context switch, I think it could lead to a sleep.

regards,

Mulyadi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux