Re: NULL dereference ? why not ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/3/07, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 16:14 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> address 0 (but only in an embedded system), i cannot think of one good

Intel Pentiums (and 80[34]86) have/had the interrupt table there (at
löeast in the realmode).

which is not valid for userspace utilization nor for general
kernelspace utilization
-mike

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux