Re: NULL dereference ? why not ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/3/07, James Stevenson <james@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes it can be valid. However there may be purpose to have data there and
accessibly but because it's a virtual address it may not have any data
mapped to it thus it is invalid.

allowing physical memory access to address 0 and virtual memory access
to address 0 is different

while i can see a valid use for allowing physical memory access to
address 0 (but only in an embedded system), i cannot think of one good
reason to allow access to virtual address 0 in light of all the debug
catching
-mike

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux