Re: GPLv3 / FSF vs. OSS/ TivO ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:57:43AM +0530, Jinesh K J wrote:
> On 10/17/06, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:08:56AM +0530, Jinesh K J wrote:
> >> On 10/15/06, Jakko Pastuchio <jakkop@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >hi all,
> >> >
> >> >can someone please explain me what's going to change in GPLv3 ?
> >> http://trends.newsforge.com/trends/06/08/02/2210213.shtml?tid=147
> >>
> >> >why do most of kernel developers resent it ?
> >> no idea! may be they are not very good in understanding licenses. see
> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/200422/
> >
> >Um, yeah, sure, we don't know anything about licenses, despite working
> >with them for years, interacting with lawyers, and convincing companies
> >about different aspects of the stuff.
> >
> >If you believe that, then why would you ever trust any of us for
> >anything as "simple" as doing the code portion of the kernel...
> I trust kernel developers as far as the kernel development is
> concerned - we have a fair game. The very essence of GPL is violated
> by the process of 'Tivoization' - this can never be justified.

Can you point out in the license of the GPL where this is "violated"?

> Can you imagine a situation in which you will be able to use your
> computer only by the pre-compiled linux kernel provided by intel or
> AMD or so... It would be terrible - at least for me.

Sure, it will never happen, for your desktop computer, the company will
go out of business.  That's just a straw-man here.

The main point is that RMS feels that the Tivo issue is big enough that
the GPL should be changed to prevent that from ever happening in the
future.  As written, v3 is stating that the only program that would fall
under this clause would be an operating system's kernel.  And since a
lot of the kernel developers have publically stated that it is
acceptable to use Linux in such a situation (bootloader only running
signed kernels), then you can imagine why us kernel developers would
feel a little defensive.

So we wrote up a little whitepaper about it.  If you wish to discuss any
of the specific points in that paper, please feel free to do so.  Just
random attacks against us because you might feel that we somehow don't
know what we are talking about, will not get you anywhere.

greg k-h

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux