On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:41:26PM +0530, pradeep singh wrote: > On 10/12/06, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [snip] > >> Does it mean USB host controller didnt recognize it at all. > >> Depends, what did the kernel log messages say? > yes it recognizes now after i gave it external power. > I am able to have a look at the device through lsusb and through sysfs > interface :). > > > >> Shouldnt it atleast assign some ID to the device on USB. > > > >In a way, yes, but your terms are a little off here. > > > >> Without a driver i may not be able to communicate to the device like > >> normal read write etc. But shouldnt it be visible to me through sysfs > >> interface? > > > >Yes it should. > Yes it is now visible. But problem is now it recognizes it as webcam > :(. Though it is not. How big is this problem? What is it really? Why would the kernel be confused this way? > or is it a problem at all? On the other hand can question specially to > Greg :). You rewrote ezusb.c in the source tree for 2.6.x kernel. I > want to use it but i somehow cant. Can i somehow use cypress_m8 module > instead of ezusb module? Please provide specifics as to why you can not use the ezusb.c calls in your driver. It works for me. > I tried but cypress_m8 module doesnot identifies the card at all :(. I don't understand, why would different random drivers work with this device. What type of device is it? What is the output of /proc/bus/usb/devices with the device plugged in? thanks, greg k-h -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
