Are there anyside effect, if we increase HZ value??? On 9/18/06, Jinesh K J <jineshkj.newsletters@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/18/06, Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi <tharindunix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1000HZ is clock tick rate, or how frequently timer interrupt is wake > up kernel, is not it?? > > Default time slice is something else ne?? > > Pls correct me if i am wrong > > from sched.c > ------------------- > #define MIN_TIMESLICE max(5 * HZ / 1000, 1) > #define DEF_TIMESLICE (100 * HZ / 1000) > #define ON_RUNQUEUE_WEIGHT 30 > > When HZ=1000; > > Default Timeslice = 100 * 1000 /1000 = 100 is not it??? > > Correct me if I am wrong ....??? Yes I guess you are right ! 1 ms should be the scheduling latency.
-- Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi all fabrications are subject to decay -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/