Re: insmod question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 18:18 +0100, pankaj chauhan wrote:

> In my case the restriction was that source code of one
> of the  binaries was not available to me, and i had to
> use APIs from that binary and it was compiled with gcc
> 2.95 and i was compiling rest of the files with gcc
> 3.4.3 

I feel sorry for you; after all you need to put in a lot of work and
can't even distribute the result, so there is a userbase of 1 ;-(

Anyway ... this is going to be "not fun" for you to make work
realistically... depending on how much of the module is unavailable to
you, it may have an entirely different ABI than what gcc 3.4 makes of
the other part... NotFun(tm)

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven


--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux