Re: daemonize and allow_signal (was: Re: Re: Re: kernel thread blocked in sock_recvmsg() not kill-able)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Toni ...

> conclusion, the real problem in my example was that i'm
> deamonize()'ing after allow_signal(SIGKILL) funtion, and as i've seen
> in
> kernel/exit.c#L272:
> this two lines must be switched... and everything works fine ;)

Hehehe :) I just read those functions closely too and I realize what the 
mistake is :)

However, does that make blocking version sock_recvmsg() works?

regards

Mulyadi


--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux