On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:59:02PM +0200, jerome lacoste wrote: > On 8/18/05, Erik Mouw <J.A.K.Mouw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It defines init_sema() twice. First as sema_init(sp, val), next time as > > init_sema(sp, val). Gcc doesn't like that. Same for initsema() and > > initnsema(). > > Aren't the lines with sema_init() removed? Eh, yeah, you're right. Here is what happens: #define init_sema(sp, val, c, d) init_sema(sp, val) #define initsema(sp, val) init_sema(sp, val) Now if you call initsema(foo, bar), gcc will complain like this: blah.c:9:22: macro "init_sema" requires 4 arguments, but only 2 given Cause init_sema() was just redefined with 4 arguments. Erik -- Erik Mouw J.A.K.Mouw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx mouw@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
