[Exerpt from lkml] On 8/18/05, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > --- linux-2.6.13-rc6-git9-orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/sema.h 2005-06-17 21:48:29.000000000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-git9/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/sema.h 2005-08-18 00:46:41.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ > > > > typedef struct semaphore sema_t; > > > > -#define init_sema(sp, val, c, d) sema_init(sp, val) > > -#define initsema(sp, val) sema_init(sp, val) > > -#define initnsema(sp, val, name) sema_init(sp, val) > > +#define init_sema(sp, val, c, d) init_sema(sp, val) > > +#define initsema(sp, val) init_sema(sp, val) > > +#define initnsema(sp, val, name) init_sema(sp, val) > > Well that's pretty nonsensical. I'll drop the patches - please don't send > things which haven't been compiled. If you can enlighten me as to what Andrew found nonsensical here, I would be happy. Jerome -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
