damn, whether the administor could delete all these posts? i am not expecting this argue to happen and also i am not interested at all to be in the position to discuss the usage of malware (what so ever) on the ethic level. At least, think with brains, if someone posts sth 'evil', wouldn't he tend to hide his intention , rather than be stupid to post all the code like i do? :-) hope that most people would 'buy' it. I am trying to understand the anger that may arise because of the hacking tools, but feeling really weird to be the target. hope that this group is being kind to ignorance ,rather than think of people as a demon. if anybody knows what the proper driver or correct way is, i am very glad to hear that. any comment is welcome, but i hope it could be more instructive (for example, with a solution :-)..) ZQ On 4/17/05, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 01:34 -0700, qiang zeng wrote: > > Well, you are right if this program is really written for the 'evil' > > purpose you have mentioned. But nobody can deny that the hacking tool > > can't be used in helping a scientific research. actually, this program > > is used for reading the data of barcodes into my realtime program, > > because the input from the barcode scanner is quite same with a > > keyboard input. I can't find any reference and so have to write such a > > program by myself. > > I don't buy this for a second; you're using hijacking techniques quite > similar to things used in malware but VERY much unlike real and proper > drivers. What you describe is something you want a proper driver for, > what you do is quite the opposite. So please spare me your lame excuses. > > -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
