Re: About Interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:22:55AM +0530, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 11:48 +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
> > Each driver must request_irq() and free_irq() its own interrupt. IOW:
> > if the serial driver is unloaded, the interrupt is free. Besides,
> > you're supposed to call free_irq() with a pointer to your own device
> > structure, not a NULL pointer.
> I think NULL can be passed on to free_irq...if the irq line is not
> shared. dev_id would be usefull only in case of shared interrupts (like
> those of PCI devices maybe...). correct me if i'm wrong.

Yes, you're right, dev_id is not required in the case of a non-shared
IRQ (but it certainly doesn't hurt).


Erik

-- 
Erik Mouw
J.A.K.Mouw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  mouw@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux