Re: copy_to_user() different in 2.6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:46:54 -0500, Timur Tabi <timur.tabi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there anything different about copy_to_user() in the 2.6 kernels?  

I have used the copy_to_user() in the 2.6 kernel (actually 2.6.5-mm1
gentoo kernel) and it works fine. A simple usage example:

char text_data[]="Blah Blah Blah";
ssize_t text_read (struct file *filp, char *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos) {
  ssize_t result=0;
  if (copy_to_user (buffer, text_data, sizeof (text_data)-1)) {
    result=-EFAULT;
    return;
  }
  else
    return result;
}

Regards,

Shaks

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux