Re: pte_offset, pte_offset_map, pte_offset_atomic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ed L Cashin wrote:

Yes!  It's a tradeoff, and I know little about the specifics of that
tradeoff.  There's probably a lot of info in the archives of the
linux-mm mailing list, though.

Actually, now that I understand the basics, I re-read the section covering pte_offset_map in Mel Gorman's book (p 50-51), and it makes a lot more sense now.


One thing he does say is that for 2.6, it's likely that PMDs will also be in high memory. I don't see a pmd_offset_map in the 2.6.5 kernel source, so I'm assuming that this change hasn't been incorporated yet. Does anyone know anything about this?

--
Timur Tabi
Staff Software Engineer
timur.tabi@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux