Re: pte_offset, pte_offset_map, pte_offset_atomic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Timur Tabi <timur.tabi@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ed L Cashin wrote:
>
>> pte_offset_map, if I recall correctly, can map a high-memory page
>> table into the kernel address space.  Later pte_unmap removes the
>> mapping.  pte_offset doesn't do that.
>
> So you're saying that the page table itself is in high memory, outside
> the normal visibility of the kernel?  Wouldn't that significantly
> impact performance?

Yes!  It's a tradeoff, and I know little about the specifics of that
tradeoff.  There's probably a lot of info in the archives of the
linux-mm mailing list, though.

-- 
  Ed L Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>


--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux