so usp <so_usp@yahoo.com.br> writes:
>> > static struct name1 name2 = {
>> > .some_struct = some_function,
>> > .some_struct = some_function,
>> >
>> > ...
>> > };
>>
>> 'name2' is the variable name.
>> 'struct name1' is the type.
>> The field 'some_struct' is initialized to
>> 'some_function'.
>
> Is this inicialization done at the system
> initialization?
> So, can I export 'some_struct' to my code and use it
> without initializing anything?
> And would I have to use these fields like:
> 'name2.some_struct' ?
It's just a new (C99 standard) syntax for struct initialization. The
initialization is the same as with older syntaxes.
I'm not going to double check the standard to make sure, but I think
in the example below, struct a will always be initialized in the same
way as struct b, and struct c in the same way as d. Someone please
correct me if I'm wrong.
struct so_usp {
int n;
int m;
};
struct so_usp a = { 2, 3, };
struct so_usp b = {
.n = 2,
.m = 3,
};
int main(void)
{
struct so_usp c = { 2, 3, };
struct so_usp d = {
.n = 2,
.m = 3,
};
return 0;
}
--
Ed L Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
