RE: Non Preemptive Kernel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can you tell us, how the retuirn code of interrupt identifies if the
control is returning to kernel space or user space. I mean how it comes
to know that interrupt occurred in kernel space or user space. What
exactly the returning code on any interrupt checks for this.

Regards,
Gaurav


-----Original Message-----
From: kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org
[mailto:kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org] On Behalf Of Jan Hudec
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 1:24 PM
To: sajay@temenos.com
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: Non Preemptive Kernel.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 10:56:31 +0530, sajay@temenos.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a doubt in the Non Preemptive Kernel. In the case of a Non 
> Preemptive Kernel, the Kernel Control Path cannot be preempted unless
it 
> relinquishes the CPU Voluntarily. In this scenario, supposing a Timer 
> interrupt occurs, how does the timer Interrupt handler find out that a

> Kernel Control Path is running and hence the process shouldn't be 
> preempted. Or is this handled by the schedule() function.

It does not. IIRC schedule happens during return to userspace. Return to
userspace does not happen if the interrupt interrupted kernel code. And
note, that it really happens during EACH return to userspace (if
need_resched is set), so if interrupt causes process to wake up, it's
scheduled soon.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<bulb@ucw.cz>

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux