Thank you for your help everytime. I didn't know the past development of O(1) scheduler. I should check the process of kernel development as much as possible from now on. Regards, Shinpei Kato -- original message -- From: Rob Love<rml@tech9.net> To: <shinny@j02.itscom.net> Cc: <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org> Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:33:42 -0500 Subject: Re: real-time tasks in kernel 2.6 >On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 23:40, shinny@j02.itscom.net wrote: > >> I want one confirmation. >> I've learned the scheduler of the linux kernel 2.6 recently and getting to understand gradually. >> But I got an unclear thing about that again. >> In my view, all the tasks including real-time tasks are managed in the same runqueue, active & expired. >> However I've read on a certain reference, from the kernel 2.6, real-time tasks are managaed the other global queue apart from the active & expired. >> Which view is correct? > >They are held in the same runqueues as all other tasks. > >In early versions of the O(1) scheduler, real-time tasks were kept in a >central global RT queue. This is no longer true, but perhaps it is the >source of your confusion. > > Rob Love > > > -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
