Re: any particular reason why c and not c++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: nix <nikhil@roc.co.in>
Subject: Re: any particular reason why c and not c++
From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:44:37 -0800
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
In-reply-to: <200311101026.19988.nikhil@roc.co.in>; from nikhil@roc.co.in on Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:26:19AM +0530
References: <200311101026.19988.nikhil@roc.co.in>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

Answered in the FAQ:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s15-3

-- Patrick Mansfield
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/

References:
- any particular reason why c and not c++
  - From: nix

Prev by Date: Re: any particular reason why c and not c++
Next by Date: LKM programming
Previous by thread: Re: any particular reason why c and not c++
Next by thread: Re: any particular reason why c and not c++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Mentors] [Linux Kernel Development] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI]

Powered by Linux