Re: any particular reason why c and not c++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: any particular reason why c and not c++
From: Catalin Mairnas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:17:49 +0000
In-reply-to: <200311101026.19988.nikhil@roc.co.in>
References: <200311101026.19988.nikhil@roc.co.in>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

nix wrote:

So why dont they convert it to c++.

http://kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s15-3

Catalin


--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/

References:
- any particular reason why c and not c++
  - From: nix

Prev by Date: Re: Not convincing yet (c vs c++)
Next by Date: Re: PCI Device list
Previous by thread: Re: any particular reason why c and not c++
Next by thread: Re: any particular reason why c and not c++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Mentors] [Linux Kernel Development] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI]

Powered by Linux