> > The source I fetched had no ./configure and no config/ and no > > Makefile.in, unlike the .tar.gz that `make dist` creates. > > > > Is that a normal result of cvs co? > > YES! Therefore now we ask: > > Should we often expect to find install.sh missing? > > We ask this because trying autoconf gives us ... > configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in config ./config linux-fsdevel volunteered a script that worked. What evil effects that same script has if run out of context, I do not know. Pat LaVarre P.S. Specifically what worked after `cvs co udftools` from sourceforge /cvsroot/linux-udf was: $ cat ./bootstrap #!/bin/sh find . \( -name autom4te.cache -o -name libtool \) -exec rm -r {} \; aclocal libtoolize --force --copy autoheader automake --add-missing --copy autoconf $ $ ./bootstrap ... $ The linux-fsdevel thread that places this script in context includes the post: Subject: Re: use cvs udftools means what From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre () ieee ! org> Date: 2003-10-24 21:15:04 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=106703018916407&w=2 -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/