On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 07:24, Eric Wong wrote: > Hi, I've ported some parts of the latest 2.5.6x scheduler to 2.4.20-ck4. > I also included variable-hz again for 1000 Hz (to match 2.5) as well as > sched-tunables. > > I'm not sure how correct it is, but it seems to work well. I made these > against ck4-rmap15d with rmap15e incremental patch, ignoring the > elevator.h unpatches in the 15e incremental. Contest benchmarks in > another email. Follow up email. I've looked at your backport and it's reasonably correct but the batch scheduler parts are lost. I'll complete it soon with the modifications akpm is using in -mm tree that fix the problems with it. Con -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/