Re: [PATCH] some 2.5 scheduler backporting to ck4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 07:24, Eric Wong wrote:
> Hi, I've ported some parts of the latest 2.5.6x scheduler to 2.4.20-ck4.
> I also included variable-hz again for 1000 Hz (to match 2.5) as well as
> sched-tunables.
>
> I'm not sure how correct it is, but it seems to work well.  I made these
> against ck4-rmap15d with rmap15e incremental patch, ignoring the
> elevator.h unpatches in the 15e incremental.  Contest benchmarks in
> another email.

Thanks very much for your work. I hate to see work repeated, but I've already 
done most of this backporting myself. The only reason I haven't released it 
is it still creates problems greater than what it fixes. Only when they're 
all fixed will I release it. 

1000Hz is of dubious advantage to desktops as far as I can see, but I have no 
objection to it being definable (as well as the scheduler tunables). I was 
thinking perhaps 200Hz would be good enough for a desktop without the 
unnecessary overhead of 1000Hz - and it is a very real disadvantage on a 
desktop. 

Anyway I'll see if the latest scheduler tweaks have fixed the hangs in the new 
scheduler and when they do I'll post an official update to -ck*.

Cheers,
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+kBtyF6dfvkL3i1gRAp3uAJ967NgwTKklPpTPNSla3u8qAwBkogCgg+EV
33IsH/DHg/YJpjbkhf5dIX8=
=mM/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux