Re: module version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:39:30AM +0300, Osman Ç?nar Eren wrote:
> Currently i use a kernel with kernel module versioning so all of my modules
> are under /lib/modules/linux_version/
> 
> now i configure a kernel without module vresioning. but although i expect to
> see the modules under /lib/modules/
> , i cant.
> 
> where do i make the mistake?

Module versions doesn't affect where the modules are located in the
filesystem -- module versions just mangle the symbols names, similar to
C++ symbol mangling, in an attempt to supply some extra type safety when
trying to use modules with differently-versioned kernels.

I'm not sure that module versioning is a good idea. The safety supplied
by the symbol mangling is not very strong. So I wouldn't suggest relying
on it to provide kernel-independence. 
 

-- 
Too bad life doesn't have a :q! command.

Attachment: pgp00181.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux