Re: Struct completion vs. semaphore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Jan Hudec wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 12:50:14PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > What are the essential differences between a struct completion and a
> > semaphore?  When is it more appropriate to use one rather than the other?
>
> Semaphores are for mutual exclusion. Completions are for waiting on events
> (I have not seen completitions used yet. Usualy wait queues are used
> directly or via wait_on_event macro).

One place where completions are used is in the usb-storage driver:
linux/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c and related files.

But you didn't answer my first question.  What are the essential
differences between a struct completion and a semaphore?

Alan Stern

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux