On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:07:38AM -0400, John F Davis wrote: > So, the way I approached this problem was to examine the call backtrace > address's. The FFFF050F address was most likely bogus so I looked at the > next address, C902AD0C. I examined /proc/ksyms for the closet match to > this address and noticed it was for a routine in the device driver. That John, I'm sorry I don't have any comments on your specific problem, but I would like to point out that the process of comparing the values in the Oopses to /proc/ksyms has been automated in a wonderful little utility named 'ksymoops'. Download a copy from a nearby ftp.kernel.org mirror, and enjoy all your extra free time. :) -- http://www.wirex.com/
Attachment:
pgp00098.pgp
Description: PGP signature
