On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 04:21, Dan Erickson wrote: > > > Sorry, I also forgot to mention that it is windows that has failed > you. As I said, most o/s's are like unix, not the other way around, so > shouldnt it have been dumbfuck Microsoft to offer at least *SOME* god damn > flexability, even if it is something like making it so it is case > sensitive? Why do I get the impression that everybody thinks I am all pro windows. That is certainly not the case. But yes, I agree. Windows should have the flexibility, just like Linux should. > If you have, lets say... 10 diffrent programs, and then you have > some other program that is diffrent at programming level. Should it be > that one single program that conforms to everybody's standard? Or should > it be all 10 programs changing there standards for one? > I am a Linux developer trying to adapt to "Windows" environment, not the other way around. That's democracy. > > -Dan Erickson- > -ColdOneKnight@rogers.com- > -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
