Re: Sets nesting/reference? Complex concatenations in vmaps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 9 May 2024, at 1:42 PM, William N. wrote:
> Regarding vmaps, I found that this syntax works:
>
> icmpv6 type . icmpv6 code . ip6 saddr . ip6 daddr . ct state vmap {
> 	1 . 1 . ::/0 . ::/0 . established : continue
> }
>
> However, just like with sets, this does not work:
>
> icmpv6 type . icmpv6 code . ip6 saddr . ip6 daddr . ct state vmap {
> 	1 . 1 . ::/0 . @ONE . established : continue
> }
>
> Is there really no way to refer to a set from within a concatenation/map?

I have yet to read the original question(s) that you sent to the list but I think the answer is that there is not.

-- 
Kerin Millar




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux