Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
From: toml <toml@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:27:57 +0200
In-reply-to: <20230801201148.GB32288@breakpoint.cc>
References: <51c40f7943609435e914c4f1fd43a98e6c579b83.camel@mail> <20230731133608.GA21425@breakpoint.cc> <b47e1dc20a97eb4e6972d5cbfd2cf9dcaaab7e06.camel@mail> <20230801201148.GB32288@breakpoint.cc>
User-agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2

Am Dienstag, dem 01.08.2023 um 22:11 +0200 schrieb Florian Westphal:
> > Have I understood this correctly?
> 
> Sounds about right, helper assignment looks correct to me.

Thank you!   :-)

Best Regards
Thomas

References:
- Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
  - From: toml
- Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
  - From: Florian Westphal
- Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
  - From: toml
- Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
  - From: Florian Westphal

Prev by Date: Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
Next by Date: nftables 1.0.6: snat with maps
Previous by thread: Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
Next by thread: Re: Nftables + ALG + Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 …?... is it a kown Problem?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux