Is there a fix in sight for this? Can I be of assistance somehow? Best Leon On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:29:28 +0100 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2 November 2016 at 11:30, Leon Merten Lohse <leon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I would really appreciate if someone could comment on this. > > > > The problem is that nft complains about overlapping intervals in the > > set, if I load the following ruleset twice. > > This occurs even though there is a `flush ruleset' directive at the > > beginning of the ruleset. As far as I understand it, all sets > > should be empty after that. > > Calling `nft flush ruleset' beforehand works around this but is no > > longer atomic. > > > > Yes, this is probably some bug in the nft cache. > > Will send a testcase so we don't forget about fixing this. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
