On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:47:41PM +0200, jalvarez wrote: > On 19/07/2016 12:28, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:59:28AM +0200, jalvarez wrote: > >>My current changes might actually break the expected behavior if it was some > >>kind of "rule id counter" instead of "iteration counter". If it is possible, > >>I would rather not put the continues in the rules loop, as the goal of these > >>changes is mostly to avoid looping through the whole ruleset. > >> > >>Again, I am very thankful for your help. > >> > >>Here is the patch > >Just sent a patch to netfilter-devel, I've Cc'ed you. It would be good > >if you can test it. > > > >Thanks. > > Thank you. > I'll be testing this as soon as my test environment is ready. > > Would you like me to send the changes to the nft-rule-get.c example in > libnftnl afterwards ? Yes please, this also provides a good way to test this. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
