Re: Ipset Error : ipset v6.25.1: Kernel error received: set type not supported (on Kernel 4.1.4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is no timeout on line 42 ....

     40 0 ipset create test bitmap:ip range 2.0.0.1-2.1.0.0 comment timeout 5
     41 # Bitmap comment: Add multiple elements with default timeout
     42 0 for x in `seq 1 255`; do echo "add test 2.0.0.$x comment
\\\"text message $x\\\""; done | ipset restore
     43 # Bitmap comment: Add multiple elements with zero timeout
     44 0 for x in `seq 1 255`; do echo "add test 2.0.1.$x timeout 0
comment \\\"text message $x\\\""; done | ipset restore

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Jozsef Kadlecsik
<kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Akshat Kakkar wrote:
>
>> Well ... quite a number of tests passed succesfully... but then some
>> test have failed.
>> partial o/p of 'make tests' is
>>
>> comment: Bitmap comment: create set with timeout: passed
>> comment: Bitmap comment: Add multiple elements with default timeout: passed
>> comment: Bitmap comment: Add multiple elements with zero timeout: passed
>> comment: Bitmap comment: List set: passed
>> comment: Bitmap comment: Check listing: passed
>> comment: Sleep 5s so that entries can time out: passed
>> comment: Bitmap comment: List set: passed
>> comment: Bitmap comment: Check listing: --- .foo  2015-08-12
>> 12:14:03.475222428 +0530
>> +++ comment.t.list12 2015-06-25 14:49:08.000000000 +0530
>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
>>  Name: test
>>  Type: bitmap:ip
>>  Header: range 2.0.0.1-2.1.0.0 timeout x comment
>> -Size in memory: 1056896
>> +Size in memory: 1056928
>>  References: 0
>> -Number of entries: 255
>> +Number of entries: 510
>>  Members:
>>  2.0.1.1 timeout x comment "text message 1"
>>  2.0.1.2 timeout x comment "text message 2"
>> FAILED
>> Failed test: diff -u -I 'Size in memory.*' .foo comment.t.list12
>> make: *** [tests] Error 1
>
> According to the diff, none of the entries with 5s timeout value timed
> out. Than may mean simply that the sleep/listing was faster than
> anticipated.
>
> Please change the timeout value to 4 (s) in line 42 in comment.t and
> re-run the test. Does it run successfully?
>
> Best regards,
> Jozsef
> -
> E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
> Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
>           H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux