Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 22:30:13 +0100
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAGYMsbuauVpzw+sF8mfKxwT=NMVt3OgBEw7DvF-T=ewKk=doYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Plouf !
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)

John Miller a écrit :
> 
> iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -d 172.16.0.0/16 -j NETMAP --to 129.64.0.0/16

The NETMAP target is valid only in the nat table.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
  - From: John Miller

References:
- iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
  - From: John Miller
- Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
  - From: Neal Murphy
- Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
  - From: Pascal Hambourg
- Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
  - From: John Miller

Prev by Date: Re: Issue with specifying interface/NIC name with drop packets rule
Next by Date: Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
Previous by thread: Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
Next by thread: Re: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux