Re: nftables compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 23:09 +0100, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> while playing with nftables, i observe that my iptables masquerading do not
> work anymore:
> 
> modprobe nft_nat
> modprobe nft_chain_nat_ipv4
> nft add table nat
> nft add chain nat postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 0 \; }
> 
> ^^ iptables nat stoped work here.
> 
> I'm sure i read that nftables and iptables  where compatible.
> 
> Can anyone point me what am i missing ?
> 
> (I'm on 3.17.4)

Sadly, masquerade is requiring 3.18. Only standard NAT is implemented in
3.17.x.

BR,
-- 
Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux