On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:56:24PM -0400, Ben Gamari wrote: > > Hello all, > > While browsing the nftables documentation I noticed that the word > "performance" is often misused in a variety of ways. For instance, > on the main page[1], > > Fast lookups through performance data structures: The new syntax > allows you to arrange you rule-set in a very performance way > contrary to purely linear-list based filtering policies. > > The use in the first sentence might be acceptable as a colloquialism but > really could be improved by replacing "performance" with "high > performance". > > The second sentence is a bit more serious as it uses "performance", a > noun, as an adjective. You might consider replacing this with > "performance-oriented" or a similar rewrite. I've found this same > mix-up in a few other places as well[2]. > > I also noticed a couple other small issues, > > * [3] misspells "hybrid" > * The "Basic operational" section of the documentation ToC would be > named "Basic operation" > > Otherwise thanks for the great packet mangling framework and thorough > documentation! I have fixed what you indicated in the nftables wiki. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
