On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:21:16 -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:34:33PM +0100, Igor S wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:34:44 -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:55:53PM +0100, Igor S wrote:
>>I am trying to build a kind of a dynamic 1:1 SNAT gateway that is
>>supposed to build every incoming IP to a unique internal IP in the
>>internal network without any port mangling.
>
>Then you should be using the NETMAP target.
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the quick reply
NETMAP would not be good for my case as the server is not supposed
to handle the entire 100.0.0.0/8 network. It only has to map the
number of addresses specified in the range. And i need to know in
advance what addresses can be used on a particular NAT server.
The idea of using SNAT is to "compress" the source network and
translate only the active clients.
Unfortunately, SNAT and NETMAP are the only two options available.
Phil
Understood. But is it normal that NAT uses absolutely the same IP/port
combination for different source IP's?
Igor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
