Re: Netfilter applied to specific interfaces only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 2013-03-09 23:10, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:52:37PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>On Friday 2013-03-08 20:14, Jim Mellander wrote:
>>>
>>>just having the iptables kernel module loaded without any ruleset 
>>>substantially reduces performance at high traffic rates.
>>
>>This one is a known issue with ip_tables/x_tables, and solved in 
>>xtables2 where you can deallocate the base chains when empty -- (more 
>>accurately, they do not exist by default and need to be created first) 
>>-- given finer control over what is being executed.
>
>Just for the record: this idea was initially introduced by nftables 
>back in 2009.

This is now recorded in the xt2 userdoc, where a section has been added 
indicating capability origin by date and thereby implementation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux